SARS-CoV-2 epidemiology on a public university campus in Washington State

Weil AA, Sohlberg SL, O'Hanlon JA, Casto AM, Emanuels AW, Lo NK, Greismer EP, Magedson AM, Wilcox NC, Kim AE, Back L, Frazar CD, Pelle B, Sibley TR, Ilcisin M, Lee J, Ryke EL, Craft JC, Schwabe-Fry KM, Fay KA, Cho S, Han PD, Heidl SJ, Pfau BA, Truong M, Zhong W, Srivatsan SR, Harb KF, Gottlieb GS, Hughes JP, Nickerson DA, Lockwood CM, Starita LM, Bedford T, Shendure JA, Chu HY. 2021. Open Forum Infect Dis: ofab464.

Abstract

Background: We aimed to evaluate a testing program to facilitate control of SARS-CoV-2 transmission at a large university and measure spread in the university community using viral genome sequencing.

Methods: Our prospective longitudinal study used remote contactless enrollment, daily mobile symptom and exposure tracking, and self-swab sample collection. Individuals were tested if the participant was exposed to a known SARS-CoV-2 infected person, developed new symptoms, or reported high-risk behavior (such as attending an indoor gathering without masking or social distancing), a member of a group experiencing an outbreak, or at enrollment. Study participants included students, staff, and faculty at an urban, public university during Autumn quarter of 2020.

Results: We enrolled 16,476 individuals, performed 29,783 SARS-CoV-2 tests, and detected 236 infections. 75.0% of positive cases reported at least one of the following: symptoms (60.8%), exposure (34.7%), or high-risk behaviors (21.5%). Greek community affiliation was the strongest risk factor for testing positive, and molecular epidemiology results suggest that specific large gatherings were responsible for several outbreaks.

Conclusion: A testing program focused on individuals with symptoms and unvaccinated persons that participate in large campus gatherings may be effective as part of a comprehensive university-wide mitigation strategy to control the SARS-CoV-2 spread.